Keker & Van Nest's John Keker, Chris Young , and Jon Streeter -- President of the State Bar of California -- Subject of Ethics Complaint Amid Allegations of Fraud

« Erika Jayne AKA Erika Girardi - Wife of Thomas Girardi of Girardi & Keese - Asked to Admit or Deny Re: Justin Bieber, DOJ's Tony West, Jeffrey Bleich, In Re Girardi, Tom Layton, Yolo County District Attorney Jeff Reisig, Michael Savage, Alan Dershowitz | Amid Concerns of Cover-Up by DOJ's Lanny Breuer YR Submit Narrative to FBI Re DOJ's Tony West, Ambassador Jeffrey Bleich, HUD's Ophelia Basgal, Keker & Van Nest's Chris Young, Kamala Harris, Phantom Non-Profit CaliforniaALL, OBAMA FOR AMERICA »

Keker & Van Nest's John Keker, Chris Young , and Jon Streeter -- President of the State Bar of California -- Subject of Ethics Complaint Amid Allegations of Fraud

by lesliebrodie ^Pro @ 18/07/2012 – 17.20:55

As public service to the community, The Leslie Brodie Report publishes an ethics complaint YR submitted against John Keker, Jon Streeter and Chris Young, below:

Jayne Kim, Chief Trial Counsel
Office of the Chief Trial Counsel/Intake
State Bar of California
1149 South Hill Street
Los Angeles, California 90015-2299 (VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL; US POSTAL MAIL -- TBD)

RE: ETHICS COMPLAINT AGAINST STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA MEMBERS CHRIS YOUNG ( # 239518) ; JON STREETER (#101970) ; JOHN KEKER (# 49092)

Dear Ms. Kim:

Please register a formal ethics complaint against Keker & Van Nest attorneys Chris Young (# 239518), Jon Streeter ( # 101970), and John Keker (# 49092) for conspiring to defraud myself and others through a failed attempt to conceal attorney Chris Young's current employment with Keker & Van Nest.

Not surprisingly, just as I managed to unearth the potential involvement of Tony West in the scheme known as CaliforniaALL, respondents quickly arranged for the removal of Young's profile from the web site of Keker & Van Nest (KVN.COM). Even to date, official records of The State Bar of California reflect that Chris Young is associated with Keker & Van Nest. However, this representation is not in agreement with misleading records found on KVN.COM.

Unfortunately, as matters presently stand, it appears that in 2008 Morrison & Foerster attorneys James Brosnahan (self-proclaimed "mastermind behind the Democratic Party.), Tony West (Barack Obama's Chair of California Finance Committee), Chris Young ("Obama for America" Northern California Deputy Finance Director) and Annette Carnegie (former director with the California Bar Foundation) in conjunction with Kamala Harris (Co-Chair, Obama for America ; member of CaliforniaALL) , Jeffrey Bleich (president of the State Bar of California, director with the California Bar Foundation, founding member and Chair of Barack Obama's National Finance Committee) may have executed a sophisticated financial scheme to misuse all or part of the "hush-hush" $780,000.00 originating from the California Bar Foundation by improperly transferring the money to Barack Obama's coffers via a separate foundation created ad hoc by Susan Mac Cormac of Morrison & Foerster, CaliforniaALL.

In seeking to conceal Young's present association with Keker & Van Nest, respondents were clearly motivated by the totality of the circumstances surrounding Young, especially around 2007-8. Specifically, similar to Tony West, Mr. Young was associated with Morrison & Foerster, as well as serving as Obama for America, Northern California Deputy Finance Director.

In addition, respondents' zeal in seeking to conceal Young's present association with Keker & Van Nest was also motivated by the totality of the circumstances surrounding a conspiracy by which members of the State Bar of California Board of Governors (including president Streeter) knowingly agreed to press false criminal charges against me with the Yolo County District Attorney alleging, among others, that an ethics complaint I had filed (dealing with CaliforniaALL - UC Davis law student Sara Granda) was "false and malicious."

Since at the time members of the board of governors conspired to knowingly file false criminal charges (around January of 2012), they were operating under the assumption that my inquiry into CaliforniaALL was headed in the wrong direction (which it was), the identity and past actions of Chris Young were irrelevant. As a matter of fact, I myself was unaware of Chris Young, or his past involvements.

However, once I managed to unearth the identity of Tony West, respondents and members of the Board of Governors sought to further mislead myself and others in hope none would be able to unearth the identity of Young, including his past involvement with Morrison & Foerster (and by extension, CaliforniaALL) , his involvement with Obama for America, his current association with Keker & Van Nest, as well as his association with Jon Streeter (also a 2008 "bundler" for Obama for America). As such, Young's profile was abruptly removed from KVN.COM for the additional purpose of covering-up members of the Board of Governors' own misconduct.

In summary, respondents' conspiracy to defraud by seeking to conceal Young's association with Keker & Van Nest was motivated by:

1. An overall desire by Keker & Van Nest and respondents to suppress the truth concerning Young's past involvement with Obama for America, Morrison & Foerster, and CaliforniaALL. Including , but not limited to, Jon Streeter own potential misconduct as "bundler" for Obama for America.

2. A specific desire by respondent Streeter and members of the Board of Governors to suppress the truth in order to cover-up their own misconduct.

Please note that pursuant to specific instructions and representations made by your office, this complaint is submitted through the use of electronic mail. In the event a new policy was implemented, please let me know ASAP, that I shall submit the complaint through the use of traditional mail.

Thank you for your time.
Options:
- Comments (1)
- Recommend / Bookmark Facebook Twitter Email
Tags:

1 Comment to Keker & Van Nest's John Keker, Chris Young , and Jon Streeter -- President of the State Bar of California -- Subject of Ethics Complaint Amid Allegations of Fraud

Leave a comment

- Royal Edward Glaude (Visitor)
- http://yahoo.com
- 21/07/2012 @ 23.01:28
I've been a consumer of the State Bar of California from 1986 through 2012 and have been told on numerous occassions that the state bar consumer advertizement is a front for some state bar employees' who use their state bar employment to successfully engage in desiring & obtaining things belonging to state bar consumers', and then use the state bar treasury through a networking operation to hide, shelter, the spoil, plunder, obtained under their employment. It has also been mentioned that the great success of some of these state bar employees' is motivated by the fact that they base their decisions based on salary incentives.

For the lay person, these well educated and very experienced state bar employees' use various tactics under the confederacy clause to obtain their goals to seize state bar consumers personal rights entitlement, property including real estate, United States Armed Forces Veterans' Benefits' ect..... as follows:

1. State Bar Employy also known as State Bar Licensed Membership Number 154248' used tactics such that defraud and or deprive state bar consumers' account number 07-27740 by prohibiting the State Bar Court from receiving evidence, then instructing the State Bar Consumer to Petition the State of California Supreme Court under Supreme Court Rule 9.13 knowing that the California Supreme Court does not accept evidence not presented to the State Bar Court, therefore accomplishing the theft of state bar consumers personal rights, monetary damages, ect..... by and through the state bar disciplinary system;
2. State Bar Employee also known as State Bar Licensed Membership Number 154248 has made it clear that no Moral Character Analyst who are paid from $76,800.-$61,104. as employees' of the state bar shall ever, meaning never have access to state bar consumer complaints' that alleged moral turpitude against state bar licensed members;
3. State Bar Employee also known as State Bar Licensed Membership Number 154248 has also made it clear that no Senior Accountant/Auditor who are paid from $77,376.-$70,332., nor any Auditor/Accountant who are paid $55,296., as employees' of the state bar shall ever, meaning never have access to state bar consumer complaints' because of the state bar salary incentive and the confederacy clause secret state bar treasury activities; AND
4. State Bar Employee also known as State Bar Licensed Membership Number 154248 has made it clear that the state bar salary incentive recruitment under the confederacy clause simply allow state bar Complaint Analyst who are paid $76,800.-$58,200. to seize state bar consumer complaints' that have merit, where some of these complaint analyst rotate jobs and are re-assigned as state bar Assistant Chief Trial Counsel who are paid $141,794.-$140,444., in the successful networking under the confederacy clause within the state bar employee domain.
5. State Bar Employee also known as State Bar License Membership Number 154248 takes her orders from state bar Chief Trial Counsel who is paid $183,264. to defraud and or deprive state bar consumers'.

Although there are most likely other tactics used by some employees' of the state bar who advertize to the state bar consumers' that they discipline attorneys' for violation of their rules of professional conduct, but in reality the state bar use the state bar disciplinary system to launder money and other things of value belonging to the state bar consumers'.
Thank you very much for allowing myself to express my experience as a consumer of the state bar domestic espionage government, that is supported by concrete evidence.
- Reply to comment
- Permalink